ArticleVaccines2022
On the Origins of Omicron's Unique Spike Gene Insertion.
Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severity of COVID-19 in hospitalised children in Espírito Santo, Brazil: a comparative analysis of pre- and post-Omicron periods.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2026Observational
- SARS-CoV-2 infection of domestic animals and their role in evolution and emergence of variants of concern.New microbes and new infections · 2024Review
- Recombinant OC43 SARS-CoV-2 spike replacement virus: An improved BSL-2 proxy virus for SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Dynamics of water-mediated interaction effects on the stability and transmission of Omicron.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Identifying featured indels associated with SARS-CoV-2 fitness.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Article
- Commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnostic tests need obligatory internal validation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genomic Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the Dominican Republic and Emergence of a Local Lineage.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Rise of the BQ.1.1.37 SARS-CoV-2 Sublineage, Italy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of RT-PCR assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Simultaneous detection of omicron and other SARS-CoV-2 variants by multiplex PCR MassARRAY technology.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Simultaneous Detection of Omicron and Other SARS-CoV-2 Variants by Multiplex PCR MassARRAY Technology.Research square · 2023Article
- The effects of amino acid substitution of spike protein and genomic recombination on the evolution of SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Long-term adaptive response in COVID-19 vaccine recipients and the effect of a booster dose.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of a heavily mutated SARS-CoV-2 variant (Omicron; Pango lineage B.1.1.529 and BA sublineages) and its rapid spread to over 75 countries raised a global public health alarm. Characterizing the mutational profile of Omicron is necessary to interpret its clinical phenotypes which are shared with or distinctive from those of other SARS-CoV-2 variants. We compared the mutations of the initially circulating Omicron variant (now known as BA.1) with prior variants of concern (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta), variants of interest (Lambda, Mu, Eta, Iota, and Kappa), and ~1500 SARS-CoV-2 lineages constituting ~5.8 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Omicron's Spike protein harbors 26 amino acid mutations (23 substitutions, 2 deletions, and 1 insertion) that are distinct compared to other variants of concern. While the substitution and deletion mutations appeared in previous SARS-CoV-2 lineages, the insertion mutation (ins214EPE) was not previously observed in any other SARS-CoV-2 lineage. Here, we consider and discuss various mechanisms through which the nucleotide sequence encoding for ins214EPE could have been acquired, including local duplication, polymerase slippage, and template switching. Although we are not able to definitively determine the mechanism, we highlight the plausibility of template switching. Analysis of the homology of the inserted nucleotide sequence and flanking regions suggests that this template-switching event could have involved the genomes of SARS-CoV-2 variants (e.g., the B.1.1 strain), other human coronaviruses that infect the same host cells as SARS-CoV-2 (e.g., HCoV-OC43 or HCoV-229E), or a human transcript expressed in a host cell that was infected by the Omicron precursor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.