Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146550›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Development of an ELISA-Based Potency Assay for Inactivated Influenza Vaccines Using Cross-Reactive Nanobodies.

Chung Y Cheung, Sitara Dubey, Martina Hadrovic, Christina R Ball, Walter Ramage, Jacqueline U McDonald, Ruth Harvey, Simon E Hufton, Othmar G Engelhardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Strategy and Application of Viral Potency Assays in Cell and Gene Therapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chung Y CheungVaccines Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.
Sitara DubeyVaccines Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.
Martina HadrovicVaccines Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.
Christina R BallBiotherapeutics Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.
Walter RamageBiotherapeutics Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.
Jacqueline U McDonaldVaccines Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.
Ruth HarveyVaccines Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.
Simon E HuftonBiotherapeutics Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1756-0306
Othmar G EngelhardtVaccines Division, Scientific Research & Innovation, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0465-9908

Funding

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority HHSO100201300005CNational Institute for Health Research NIBSC Regulatory Science Research Unit
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivated vaccines are the main influenza vaccines used today; these are usually presented as split (detergent-disrupted) or subunit vaccines, while whole-virus-inactivated influenza vaccines are rare. The single radial immune diffusion (SRD) assay has been used as the gold standard potency assay for inactivated influenza vaccines for decades; however, more recently, various alternative potency assays have been proposed. A new potency test should be able to measure the amount of functional antigen in the vaccine, which in the case of influenza vaccines is the haemagglutinin (HA) protein. Potency tests should also be able to detect the loss of potency caused by changes to the structural and functional integrity of HA. To detect such changes, most alternative potency tests proposed to date use antibodies that react with native HA. Due to the frequent changes in influenza vaccine composition, antibodies may need to be updated in line with changes in vaccine viruses. We have developed two ELISA-based potency assays for group 1 influenza A viruses using cross-reactive nanobodies. The nanobodies detect influenza viruses of subtype H1N1 spanning more than three decades, as well as H5N1 viruses, in ELISA. We found that the new ELISA potency assays are sensitive to the nature of the reference antigen (standard) used to quantify vaccine antigens; using standards matched in their presentation to the vaccine type improved correspondence between the ELISA and SRD assays.

Indexed as

cross-reactiveELISAinfluenzananobodiespotency testvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36146550
PMCPMC9503116
OpenAlexW4295094754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.