ArticleVaccines2022
The Immune Subtypes and Landscape of Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative metastatic Krukenberg tumors withOncology letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Immune Subtypes and Characteristics of Endometrial Cancer Based on Immunogenes.Cancer management and research · 2024Article
- The Potential Value of RPS27A in Prognosis and Immunotherapy: From Pan-Cancer Analysis to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Validation.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2024Article
- Defining the Role of Metastasis-Initiating Cells in Promoting Carcinogenesis in Ovarian Cancer.Biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Immunotherapy has played a significant role in the treatment of a variety of hematological and solid tumors, but its application in ovarian cancer (OC) remains unclear. This study aimed to identify immune subtypes of OC and delineate an immune landscape for selecting suitable patients for immunotherapy, thereby providing potent therapeutic targets for immunotherapy drug development. Three immune subtypes (IS1-IS3) with distinctive molecular, cellular, and clinical characteristics were identified from the TCGA and GSE32062 cohorts. Compared to IS1, IS3 has a better prognosis and exhibits an immunological "hot". IS3, in contrast, exhibits an immunological "cold" and has a worse prognosis in OC patients. Moreover, gene mutations, immune modulators, CA125, CA199, and HE4 expression, along with sensitivity either to immunotherapy or chemotherapy, were significantly different among the three immune subtypes. The OC immune landscape was highly heterogeneous between individual patients. Poor prognosis was correlated with low expression of the hub genes CD2, CD3D, and CD3E, which could act not only as biomarkers for predicting prognosis, but also as potential immunotherapy targets. Our study elucidates the immunotyping and molecular characteristics of the immune microenvironment in OC, which could provide an effective immunotherapy stratification method for optimally selecting patients, and also has clinical significance for the development of new immunotherapy as well as rational combination strategies for the treatment of OC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.