Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146414›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Critical Analysis of the Current Medical Image-Based Processing Techniques for Automatic Disease Evaluation: Systematic Literature Review.

Baidaa Mutasher Rashed, Nirvana Popescu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baidaa Mutasher RashedComputer Science Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5193-0334
Nirvana PopescuComputer Science Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7843-7187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image processing and analysis techniques play a significant role in diagnosing diseases. Thus, during the last decade, several noteworthy improvements in medical diagnostics have been made based on medical image processing techniques. In this article, we reviewed articles published in the most important journals and conferences that used or proposed medical image analysis techniques to diagnose diseases. Starting from four scientific databases, we applied the PRISMA technique to efficiently process and refine articles until we obtained forty research articles published in the last five years (2017-2021) aimed at answering our research questions. The medical image processing and analysis approaches were identified, examined, and discussed, including preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction, classification, evaluation metrics, and diagnosis techniques. This article also sheds light on machine learning and deep learning approaches. We also focused on the most important medical image processing techniques used in these articles to establish the best methodologies for future approaches, discussing the most efficient ones and proposing in this way a comprehensive reference source of methods of medical image processing and analysis that can be very useful in future medical diagnosis systems.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningDatabases, Factualdeep learningdiagnosis systemmachine learningmedical image analysis

Identifiers

PMID36146414
PMCPMC9501859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.