Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146408›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Cluster-Driven Adaptive Training Approach for Federated Learning.

Younghwan Jeong, Taeyoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Younghwan JeongDepartment of Computer Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8719-2938
Taeyoon KimDepartment of Mobile System Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5623-3941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is a promising collaborative learning approach in edge computing, reducing communication costs and addressing the data privacy concerns of traditional cloud-based training. Owing to this, diverse studies have been conducted to distribute FL into industry. However, there still remain the practical issues of FL to be solved (e.g., handling non-IID data and stragglers) for an actual implementation of FL. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a cluster-driven adaptive training approach (CATA-Fed) to enhance the performance of FL training in a practical environment. CATA-Fed employs adaptive training during the local model updates to enhance the efficiency of training, reducing the waste of time and resources due to the presence of the stragglers and also provides a straggler mitigating scheme, which can reduce the workload of straggling clients. In addition to this, CATA-Fed clusters the clients considering the data size and selects the training participants within a cluster to reduce the magnitude differences of local gradients collected in the global model update under a statistical heterogeneous condition (e.g., non-IID data). During this client selection process, a proportional fair scheduling is employed for securing the data diversity as well as balancing the load of clients. We conduct extensive experiments using three benchmark datasets (MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10), and the results show that CATA-Fed outperforms the previous FL schemes (FedAVG, FedProx, and TiFL) with regard to the training speed and test accuracy under the diverse FL conditions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLearningHumansMachine Learningadaptive trainingclusteringfederated learningnon-IIDproportional fairnessstraggler

Identifiers

PMID36146408
PMCPMC9502390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.