Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146386›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Estimation by Photoplethysmography and Its Interpretation.

Vincent Fleischhauer, Aarne Feldheiser, Sebastian Zaunseder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent developments in machine learning modeling methods for hypertension treatment.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vincent FleischhauerFaculty of Information Technology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1852-9266
Aarne FeldheiserDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft, 45136 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0014-8879
Sebastian ZaunsederFaculty of Information Technology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6114-3142

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 401786308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is among the most important vital signals. Estimation of absolute BP solely using photoplethysmography (PPG) has gained immense attention over the last years. Available works differ in terms of used features as well as classifiers and bear large differences in their results. This work aims to provide a machine learning method for absolute BP estimation, its interpretation using computational methods and its critical appraisal in face of the current literature. We used data from three different sources including 273 subjects and 259,986 single beats. We extracted multiple features from PPG signals and its derivatives. BP was estimated by xgboost regression. For interpretation we used Shapley additive values (SHAP). Absolute systolic BP estimation using a strict separation of subjects yielded a mean absolute error of 9.456mmHg and correlation of 0.730. The results markedly improve if data separation is changed (MAE: 6.366mmHg,

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationPhotoplethysmographyAlgorithmsBlood PressureHumansPulse Wave Analysisblood pressureestimationexplainabilityinterpretationphotoplethysmographypulse decomposition analysispulse wave decompositionShapley values

Identifiers

PMID36146386
PMCPMC9506534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.