ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Image Recovery from Synthetic Noise Artifacts in CT Scans Using Modified U-Net.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motion Artifact Reduction Using U-Net Model with Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Datasets for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- CT image denoising methods for image quality improvement and radiation dose reduction.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed Tomography (CT) is commonly used for cancer screening as it utilizes low radiation for the scan. One problem with low-dose scans is the noise artifacts associated with low photon count that can lead to a reduced success rate of cancer detection during radiologist assessment. The noise had to be removed to restore detail clarity. We propose a noise removal method using a new model Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Even though the network training time is long, the result is better than other CNN models in quality score and visual observation. The proposed CNN model uses a stacked modified U-Net with a specific number of feature maps per layer to improve the image quality, observable on an average PSNR quality score improvement out of 174 images. The next best model has 0.54 points lower in the average score. The score difference is less than 1 point, but the image result is closer to the full-dose scan image. We used separate testing data to clarify that the model can handle different noise densities. Besides comparing the CNN configuration, we discuss the denoising quality of CNN compared to classical denoising in which the noise characteristics affect quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.