ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
PDC: Pearl Detection with a Counter Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pearl detection with a counter (PDC) in a noncontact and high-precision manner is a challenging task in the area of commercial production. Additionally, sea pearls are considered to be quite valuable, so the traditional manual counting methods are not satisfactory, as touching may cause damage to the pearls. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study on nine object-detection models, and the key metrics of these models are evaluated. The results indicate that using Faster R-CNN with ResNet152, which was pretrained on the pearl dataset, mAP@0.5IoU = 100% and mAP@0.75IoU = 98.83% are achieved for pearl recognition, requiring only 15.8 ms inference time with a counter after the first loading of the model. Finally, the superiority of the proposed algorithm of Faster R-CNN ResNet152 with a counter is verified through a comparison with eight other sophisticated object detectors with a counter. The experimental results on the self-made pearl image dataset show that the total loss decreased to 0.00044. Meanwhile, the classification loss and the localization loss of the model gradually decreased to less than 0.00019 and 0.00031, respectively. The robust performance of the proposed method across the pearl dataset indicates that Faster R-CNN ResNet152 with a counter is promising for natural light or artificial light peal detection and accurate counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.