ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Rapid Assessment of Microbial Quality in Edible Seaweeds Using Sensor Techniques Based on Spectroscopy, Imaging Analysis and Sensors Mimicking Human Senses.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Review on Seaweed Preservation Techniques: Impacts on Nutritional Quality, Safety and Shelf Life.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The expansion of the seaweed aquaculture sector along with the rapid deterioration of these products escalates the importance of implementing rapid, real-time techniques for their quality assessment. Seaweed samples originating from Scotland and Ireland were stored under various temperature conditions for specific time intervals. Microbiological analysis was performed throughout storage to assess the total viable counts (TVC), while in parallel FT-IR spectroscopy, multispectral imaging (MSI) and electronic nose (e-nose) analyses were conducted. Machine learning models (partial least square regression (PLS-R)) were developed to assess any correlations between sensor and microbiological data. Microbial counts ranged from 1.8 to 9.5 log CFU/g, while the microbial growth rate was affected by origin, harvest year and storage temperature. The models developed using FT-IR data indicated a good prediction performance on the external test dataset. The model developed by combining data from both origins resulted in satisfactory prediction performance, exhibiting enhanced robustness from being origin unaware towards microbiological population prediction. The results of the model developed with the MSI data indicated a relatively good prediction performance on the external test dataset in spite of the high RMSE values, whereas while using e-nose data from both MI and SAMS, a poor prediction performance of the model was reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.