Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146348›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

How Much Data Is Enough? A Reliable Methodology to Examine Long-Term Wearable Data Acquisition in Gait and Postural Sway.

Brett M Meyer, Paolo Depetrillo, Jaime Franco, Nicole Donahue, Samantha R Fox, Aisling O'Leary, Bryn C Loftness, Reed D Gurchiek, Maura Buckley, Andrew J Solomon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Continuous Monitoring of Head Turns: Compliance, Kinematics, and Reliability of Wearable Sensing.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Assessing Free-Living Postural Sway in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chest-Based Wearables and Individualized Distributions for Assessing Postural Sway in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Digital Phenotypes of Instability and Fatigue Derived From Daily Standing Transitions in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brett M MeyerM-Sense Research Group, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3313-1555
Paolo DepetrilloMedidata Solutions, A Dassault Systèmes Company, New York, NY 10014, USA.
Jaime FrancoMedidata Solutions, A Dassault Systèmes Company, New York, NY 10014, USA.
Nicole DonahueM-Sense Research Group, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Samantha R FoxM-Sense Research Group, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Aisling O'LearyM-Sense Research Group, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-5921
Bryn C LoftnessM-Sense Research Group, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-0783
Reed D GurchiekDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Maura BuckleyMedidata Solutions, A Dassault Systèmes Company, New York, NY 10014, USA.
Andrew J SolomonDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-1554
Sau Kuen NgMedidata Solutions, A Dassault Systèmes Company, New York, NY 10014, USA.
Nick CheneyM-Sense Research Group, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Melissa CeruoloMedidata Solutions, A Dassault Systèmes Company, New York, NY 10014, USA.
Ryan S McGinnisM-Sense Research Group, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8396-6967
University of Vermont · USDassault Systèmes (United States) · USStanford University · US

Funding

Just-In-Time Fall Prevention: Development of an mHealth Intervention for Persons with Multiple SclerosisR21EB027852 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI MCGINNIS, RYAN S. · 2019 to 2021
$610k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB027852NIH HHS EB027852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable sensors facilitate the evaluation of gait and balance impairment in the free-living environment, often with observation periods spanning weeks, months, and even years. Data supporting the minimal duration of sensor wear, which is necessary to capture representative variability in impairment measures, are needed to balance patient burden, data quality, and study cost. Prior investigations have examined the duration required for resolving a variety of movement variables (e.g., gait speed, sit-to-stand tests), but these studies use differing methodologies and have only examined a small subset of potential measures of gait and balance impairment. Notably, postural sway measures have not yet been considered in these analyses. Here, we propose a three-level framework for examining this problem. Difference testing and intra-class correlations (ICC) are used to examine the agreement in features computed from potential wear durations (levels one and two). The association between features and established patient reported outcomes at each wear duration is also considered (level three) for determining the necessary wear duration. Utilizing wearable accelerometer data continuously collected from 22 persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) for 6 weeks, this framework suggests that 2 to 3 days of monitoring may be sufficient to capture most of the variability in gait and sway; however, longer periods (e.g., 3 to 6 days) may be needed to establish strong correlations to patient-reported clinical measures. Regression analysis indicates that the required wear duration depends on both the observation frequency and variability of the measure being considered. This approach provides a framework for evaluating wear duration as one aspect of the comprehensive assessment, which is necessary to ensure that wearable sensor-based methods for capturing gait and balance impairment in the free-living environment are fit for purpose.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisWearable Electronic DevicesGaitHumansPostural BalanceWalking Speedgaitneurological disorderspostural swayremote monitoringwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID36146348
PMCPMC9503816
OpenAlexW4296046672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.