Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146152›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Learning Gait Representations with Noisy Multi-Task Learning.

Adrian Cosma, Emilian Radoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrian CosmaFaculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 006042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0307-2520
Emilian RadoiFaculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 006042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1177-5288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait analysis is proven to be a reliable way to perform person identification without relying on subject cooperation. Walking is a biometric that does not significantly change in short periods of time and can be regarded as unique to each person. So far, the study of gait analysis focused mostly on identification and demographics estimation, without considering many of the pedestrian attributes that appearance-based methods rely on. In this work, alongside gait-based person identification, we explore pedestrian attribute identification solely from movement patterns. We propose DenseGait, the largest dataset for pretraining gait analysis systems containing 217 K anonymized tracklets, annotated automatically with 42 appearance attributes. DenseGait is constructed by automatically processing video streams and offers the full array of gait covariates present in the real world. We make the dataset available to the research community. Additionally, we propose GaitFormer, a transformer-based model that after pretraining in a multi-task fashion on DenseGait, achieves 92.5% accuracy on CASIA-B and 85.33% on FVG, without utilizing any manually annotated data. This corresponds to a +14.2% and +9.67% accuracy increase compared to similar methods. Moreover, GaitFormer is able to accurately identify gender information and a multitude of appearance attributes utilizing only movement patterns. The code to reproduce the experiments is made publicly.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPattern Recognition, AutomatedGaitGait AnalysisHumansWalkinggait recognitionmulti-task learningpose estimationself-supervised learningweakly-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID36146152
PMCPMC9506362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.