ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Correction of Radiometry Data for Temperature Effect on Dark Current, with Application to Radiometers on Profiling Floats.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: O'Brien et al. Correction of Radiometry Data for Temperature Effect on Dark Current, with Application to Radiometers on Profiling Floats.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measurements of daytime radiometry in the ocean are necessary to constrain processes such as photosynthesis, photo-chemistry and radiative heating. Profiles of downwelling irradiance provide a means to compute the concentration of a variety of in-water constituents. However, radiometers record a non-negligible signal when no light is available, and this signal is temperature dependent (called the dark current). Here, we devise and evaluate two consistent methods for correction of BGC-Argo radiometry measurements for dark current: one based on measurements during the day, the other based on night measurements. A daytime data correction is needed because some floats never measure at night. The corrections are based on modeling the temperature of the radiometer and show an average bias in the measured value of nearly 0.01 W m-2 nm-1, 3 orders of magnitude larger than the reported uncertainty of 2.5×10-5 W m-2 nm-1 for the sensors deployed on BGC-Argo floats (SeaBird scientific OCR504 radiometers). The methods are designed to be simple and robust, requiring pressure, temperature and irradiance data. The correction based on nighttime profiles is recommended as the primary method as it captures dark measurements with the largest dynamic range of temperature. Surprisingly, more than 28% of daytime profiles (130,674 in total) were found to record significant downwelling irradiance at 240-250 dbar. The correction is shown to be small relative to near-surface radiance and thus most useful for studies investigating light fields in the twilight zone and the impacts of radiance on deep organisms. Based on these findings, we recommend that BGC-Argo floats profile occasionally at night and to depths greater than 250 dbar. We provide codes to perform the dark corrections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.