Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145994›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Histological Evaluation of Cassava Starch/Chicken Gelatin Membranes.

Carlos Humberto Valencia-Llano, Jorge Iván Castro, Marcela Saavedra, Paula A Zapata, Diana Paola Navia-Porras, Edwin Flórez-López, Carolina Caicedo, Heidy Lorena Calambas, Carlos David Grande-Tovar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Humberto Valencia-LlanoResearch Group in Biomateriales Dentales, School of Odontología, Faculty of Health, Campus San Fernando, Universidad del Valle, Calle 4B # 36-00, Cali 76001, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4892-9786
Jorge Iván CastroResearch Group SIMERQO, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural and Exact Sciences, Campus Melendez, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 No. 100-00, Santiago de Cali 76001, Colombia.
Marcela SaavedraResearch Group of Polímeros, Department of Chemistry, Faculty de Chemistry and Biology, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Santiago 9170020, Chile.
Paula A ZapataResearch Group of Polímeros, Department of Chemistry, Faculty de Chemistry and Biology, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Santiago 9170020, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3361-6226
Diana Paola Navia-PorrasResearch Group Biotecnología, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de San Buenaventura Cali, Carrera 122 # 6-65, Santiago de Cali 76001, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-8448-174X
Edwin Flórez-LópezResearch Group in Química y Biotecnología QUIBIO, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Calle 5 No 62-00, Cali 760035, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6312-7568
Carolina CaicedoResearch Group GIGAE3D, Faculty of Engineering, Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca (UCEVA), Carrera 17ª 48-144, Tuluá 763022, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9487-4598
Heidy Lorena CalambasResearch Group in Desarrollo de Materiales y Productos, Centro Nacional de Asistencia Técnica a la Industria (ASTIN), SENA, Cali 760003, Colombia.
Carlos David Grande-TovarResearch Group of Fotoquímica y Fotobiología, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia 081008, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6243-4571
Universidad del Valle · COUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CLCentral University of Valle del Cauca · CONational Training Service · COUniversidad de San Buenaventura, Bogota · COUniversidad Santiago de Cali · COUniversity of Atlántico · CO

Funding

Universidad Santiago de Cali call No. 01-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of biopolymers for tissue engineering has recently gained attention due to the need for safer and highly compatible materials. Starch is one of the most used biopolymers for membrane preparation. However, incorporating other polymers into starch membranes introduces improvements, such as better thermal and mechanical resistance and increased water affinity, as we reported in our previous work. There are few reports in the literature on the biocompatibility of starch/chicken gelatin composites. We assessed the in vivo biocompatibility of the five composites (T1-T5) cassava starch/gelatin membranes with subdermal implantations in biomodels at 30, 60, and 90 days. The FT-IR spectroscopy analysis demonstrated the main functional groups for starch and chicken gelatin. At the same time, the thermal study exhibited an increase in thermal resistance for T3 and T4, with a remaining mass (~15 wt.%) at 800 °C. The microstructure analysis for the T2-T4 demonstrated evident roughness changes with porosity presence due to starch and gelatin mixture. The decrease in the starch content in the composites also decreased the gelatinization heats for T3 and T4 (195.67, 196.40 J/g, respectively). Finally, the implantation results demonstrated that the formulations exhibited differences in the degradation and resorption capacities according to the starch content, which is easily degraded by amylases. However, the histological results showed that the samples demonstrated almost complete reabsorption without a severe immune response, indicating a high in vivo biocompatibility. These results show that the cassava starch/chicken gelatin composites are promising membrane materials for tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitybiocompositecassava starchchicken gelatincomposite membranestissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36145994
PMCPMC9506157
OpenAlexW4296095927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.