Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145849›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Utilisation of Paunch Waste as a Natural Fibre in Biocomposites.

Clement Matthew Chan, Darren Martin, Emilie Gauthier, Paul Jensen, Bronwyn Laycock, Steven Pratt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clement Matthew ChanSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-4790
Darren MartinSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-6765
Emilie GauthierSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Paul JensenAustralian Centre for Water and Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Bronwyn LaycockSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-844X
Steven PrattSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Meat & Livestock Australia Wastes to Profits
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paunch is a fibrous solid residue consisting of partially digested feed from the stomachs of processed cattle. It is the largest untapped solid waste stream from animals at meat processing plants, and potentially a valuable source of fibres for the production of sustainable and potentially higher-value natural biocomposite materials. Paunch was obtained from the waste effluent of a red meat processing plant, and the fibre characteristics of the as-obtained material were studied and benchmarked against wood flour and ground buffel grass, with a view to evaluating the potential of paunch as a fibre for polymer composites. The ground paunch possessed a rough fibrous surface and fibre-like characteristics that were comparable to both wood flour and ground buffel grass, demonstrating their potential for use in composites. Without any pre-treatment or compatibilisation, composites of a representative biopolymer, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and ground paunch were successfully produced for the first time via extrusion, with up to 50 wt% paunch content. Mechanical property analysis showed that, at 30 wt% content, PHBV/ground paunch composites yielded mechanical properties that were comparable to those of composites with ground buffel grass.

Indexed as

agricultural wastebiocompositebiodegradablebiopolymerextrusionnatural fibre-polymer compositespaunch

Identifiers

PMID36145849
PMCPMC9505451
OpenAlexW4296112247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.