ArticlePharmaceutics2022
Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Intraperitoneally Administered Cu-Conjugated Anti-EGFR Antibody NCAB001 for the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer Using PET.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in early detection of pancreatic cancer: the role of artificial intelligence and novel imaging techniques.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- The 13th World Federation of Nuclear Medicine and Biology congress (WFNMB 2022): summarize the past half century and discuss the next half century of WFNMB.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Small Molecular PET Tracers for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: Preclinical Stage.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Process to Remove the Size Variants Contained in the Antibody-Chelator Complex PCTA-NCAB001 for Radiolabeling with Copper-64.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting tumor lesions <1 cm in size using current imaging methods remains a clinical challenge, especially in pancreatic cancer. Previously, we developed a method to identify pancreatic tumor lesions ≥3 mm using positron emission tomography (PET) with an intraperitoneally administered 64Cu-labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody (64Cu-NCAB001 ipPET). Here, we conducted an extended single-dose toxicity study of 64Cu-NCAB001 ipPET in mice based on approach 1 of the current ICH M3 [R2] guideline, as our new drug formulation contains 45 μg of the antibody. We used NCAB001 labeled with stable copper isotope instead of 64Cu. The total content of size variants was approximately 6.0% throughout the study. The relative binding potency of Cu-NCAB001 to recombinant human EGFR was comparable to that of cetuximab. The general and neurological toxicities of Cu-NCAB001 ipPET at 62.5 or 625 μg/kg were assessed in mice. The no-observed-adverse-effect level of Cu-NCAB001 was 625 μg/kg, a dose approximately 1000-fold higher at the μg/kg level than the dose of 64Cu-NCAB001 in our formulation (45 µg). The size variants did not affect the safety of the formulation. Therefore, clinical studies on the efficacy of 64Cu-NCAB001 ipPET for early detection of pancreatic cancer using PET imaging can be safely conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.