Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145667›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients.

Simon Kallee, Christina Scharf, Lea Marie Schatz, Michael Paal, Michael Vogeser, Michael Irlbeck, Johannes Zander, Michael Zoller, Uwe Liebchen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon KalleeDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8364-2986
Christina ScharfDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Lea Marie SchatzDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry, Clinical Pharmacy, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Michael PaalInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-0238
Michael VogeserInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Michael IrlbeckDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Johannes ZanderLaboratory Dr. Brunner, Luisenstr. 7e, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
Michael ZollerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Uwe LiebchenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4375-0923
LMU Klinikum · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voriconazole (VRC) is used as first line antifungal agent against invasive aspergillosis. Model-based approaches might optimize VRC therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models of VRC without pharmacogenetic information for their suitability for model-informed precision dosing. Seven PopPK models were selected from a systematic literature review. A total of 66 measured VRC plasma concentrations from 33 critically ill patients was employed for analysis. The second measurement per patient was used to calculate relative Bias (rBias), mean error (ME), relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) (i) only based on patient characteristics and dosing history (a priori) and (ii) integrating the first measured concentration to predict the second concentration (Bayesian forecasting). The a priori rBias/ME and rRMSE/MAE varied substantially between the models, ranging from -15.4 to 124.6%/-0.70 to 8.01 mg/L and from 89.3 to 139.1%/1.45 to 8.11 mg/L, respectively. The integration of the first TDM sample improved the predictive performance of all models, with the model by Chen (85.0%) showing the best predictive performance (rRMSE: 85.0%; rBias: 4.0%). Our study revealed a certain degree of imprecision for all investigated models, so their sole use is not recommendable. Models with a higher performance would be necessary for clinical use.

Indexed as

antifungalcritically illinvasive aspergillosismodel informed precision dosingpharmacokineticspharmacometricspopulation pharmacokineticsprecision medicinetherapeutic drug monitoringvoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID36145667
PMCPMC9505877
OpenAlexW4296308879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.