Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145555›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Fast-Fed Variability: Insights into Drug Delivery, Molecular Manifestations, and Regulatory Aspects.

Nagarjun Rangaraj, Sunitha Sampathi, Vijayabhaskarreddy Junnuthula, Praveen Kolimi, Preethi Mandati, Sagar Narala, Dinesh Nyavanandi, Sathish Dyawanapelly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transforming Treatment: The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Oral Drug Absorption.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Recent Advances in Oral Drug Delivery Systems for BCS III Drugs.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in colon-targeted drug technologies.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nagarjun RangarajDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad 500037, India.
Sunitha SampathiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad 500037, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2169-7698
Vijayabhaskarreddy JunnuthulaDrug Research Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Praveen KolimiDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.
Preethi MandatiDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.
Sagar NaralaDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.
Dinesh NyavanandiPharmaceutical Development Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cincinnati, OH 45237, USA.
Sathish DyawanapellyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai 400019, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2310-1651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among various drug administration routes, oral drug delivery is preferred and is considered patient-friendly; hence, most of the marketed drugs are available as conventional tablets or capsules. In such cases, the administration of drugs with or without food has tremendous importance on the bioavailability of the drugs. The presence of food may increase (positive effect) or decrease (negative effect) the bioavailability of the drug. Such a positive or negative effect is undesirable since it makes dosage estimation difficult in several diseases. This may lead to an increased propensity for adverse effects of drugs when a positive food effect is perceived. However, a negative food effect may lead to therapeutic insufficiency for patients suffering from life-threatening disorders. This review emphasizes the causes of food effects, formulation strategies to overcome the fast-fed variability, and the regulatory aspects of drugs with food effects, which may open new avenues for researchers to design products that may help to eliminate fast-fed variability.

Indexed as

bioavailabilityfast-fed variabilityfood effectformulationpharmacokineticspH dependent

Identifiers

PMID36145555
PMCPMC9505616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.