ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Plasma Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Doxorubicin in Rats following Treatment with Astragali Radix.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Computational and Transcriptional Analysis of NF-κB and HIF-1α Modulation Following Doxorubicin Treatment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2026Article
- Accumulation Kinetics and Biological Action of Doxorubicin in Rabbit Intervertebral Discs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- In Vivo Tissue Distribution and Pharmacokinetics of FITC-LabelledFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is an essential component in chemotherapy, and Astragali Radix (AR) is a widely used tonic herbal medicine. The combination of DOX and AR offers widespread, well-documented advantages in treating cancer, e.g., reducing the risk of adverse effects. This study mainly aims to uncover the impact of AR on DOX disposition in vivo. Rats received a single intravenous dose of 5 mg/kg DOX following a single-dose co-treatment or multiple-dose pre-treatment of AR (10 g/kg × 1 or × 10). The concentrations of DOX in rat plasma and six tissues, including heart, liver, lung, kidney, spleen, and skeletal muscle, were determined by a fully validated LC-MS/MS method. A network-based approach was further employed to quantify the relationships between enzymes that metabolize and transport DOX and the targets of nine representative AR components in the human protein−protein interactome. We found that short-term (≤10 d) AR administration was ineffective in changing the plasma pharmacokinetics of DOX in terms of the area under the concentration−time curve (AUC, 1303.35 ± 271.74 μg/L*h versus 1208.74 ± 145.35 μg/L*h, p > 0.46), peak concentrations (Cmax, 1351.21 ± 364.86 μg/L versus 1411.01 ± 368.38 μg/L, p > 0.78), and half-life (t1/2, 31.79 ± 5.12 h versus 32.05 ± 6.95 h, p > 0.94), etc. Compared to the isotype control group, DOX concentrations in six tissues slightly decreased under AR pre-administration but only showed statistical significance (p < 0.05) in the liver. Using network analysis, we showed that five of the nine representative AR components were not localized to the vicinity of the DOX disposition-associated module. These findings suggest that AR may mitigate DOX-induced toxicity by affecting drug targets rather than drug disposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.