Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145239›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Dietary Supplement Use of Turkish Footballers: Differences by Sex and Competition Level.

Elif Günalan, Betül Yıldırım Çavak, Saadet Turhan, İrem Kaya Cebioğlu, Raúl Domínguez, Antonio Jesús Sánchez-Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. From Science to Dressing Room: Dietary Supplements for Elite Soccer Performance.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Nutritional perspectives in female soccer: a scoping review.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Evaluation of Videos about Branched-Chain Amino Acids Supplements on YouTubeInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elif GünalanDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Health and Technology University, 34025 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3644-5066
Betül Yıldırım ÇavakDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Health and Technology University, 34025 Istanbul, Turkey.
Saadet TurhanDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Istanbul Health and Technology University, 34025 Istanbul, Turkey.
İrem Kaya CebioğluDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Yeditepe University, 34755 Istanbul, Turkey.
Raúl DomínguezDepartamento de Motricidad Humana y Rendimiento Deportivo, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6891-391X
Antonio Jesús Sánchez-OliverDepartamento de Motricidad Humana y Rendimiento Deportivo, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9022-6043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the consumption of dietary supplements (DS) and to determine related topics in Turkish football players of different sexes and competition levels. A total of 117 footballers (79 males and 38 females) completed a specific survey regarding DS consumption in athletes. The type of DS ingested was classified based on the level of scientific evidence by the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS): group A (high level of scientific evidence), group B (DS that could have a positive effect, but require more evidence), group C (evidence is against their use), and group D (prohibited substances). After a Kolmogorov−Smirnov test, a t-test or Mann−Whitney U test was performed for quantitative variables, while Pearson’s chi-square and odds ratio (with the confidence interval) were performed for qualitative variables. Of the sample, 87.2% reported having consumed DS, with a higher consumption rate in males (males: 93.7%, females: 73.7%; p = 0.006; OR = 5.3 [1.7−16.8]) and professional players (professional: 98.2%, non-professional: 77.4%; p < 0.001; OR = 7.9 [1.2−52.3]). Males and professional players consume more sports foods (p < 0.001), performance supplements (p < 0.001), and total group A supplements (p < 0.001) compared to females and non-professionals. In addition, males consume more medical supplements (p = 0.012) and total group C supplements (p < 0.001) than female footballers. The most consumed DS were sports drinks (63.2%), magnesium (52.1%), vitamin C (51.3%), vitamin D (46.2%), caffeine (38.5%), sports bars (37.6%), whey protein (28.2%), meat protein (25.6%), vitamin E (24.8%), and omega-3 fatty acids (24.8%). The supplement consumption was higher in male and professional footballers. According to the AIS classification, there were significant differences in the consumption of sports foods, medical supplements, performance supplements, and the total number of group A and group C supplements according to sex, and there were significant differences in the consumption of sports foods, performance supplements, and the total number of group A supplements according to competition level.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFatty Acids, Omega-3SoccerAscorbic AcidAthletesAustraliaCaffeineFemaleHumansMagnesiumMaleMeat ProteinsVitamin DVitamin EVitaminsWhey ProteinsAscorbic AcidCaffeineFatty Acids, Omega-3MagnesiumMeat ProteinsVitamin DVitamin EVitaminsWhey Proteinsdieteticergogenic aidnutritionsoccersport team

Identifiers

PMID36145239
PMCPMC9503904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.