Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145235›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

The Metabolome and the Gut Microbiota for the Prediction of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation: A Systematic Review.

Laura Moschino, Giovanna Verlato, Miriam Duci, Maria Elena Cavicchiolo, Silvia Guiducci, Matteo Stocchero, Giuseppe Giordano, Francesco Fascetti Leon, Eugenio Baraldi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: What's New and What's Next?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Impact of mother's own milkMicrobiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura MoschinoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Giovanna VerlatoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Miriam DuciPaediatric Surgery, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Maria Elena CavicchioloNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Silvia GuiducciNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3202-0930
Matteo StoccheroInstitute of Paediatric Research, Città della Speranza, Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Metabolomics, 35127 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-8390
Giuseppe GiordanoInstitute of Paediatric Research, Città della Speranza, Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Metabolomics, 35127 Padova, Italy.
Francesco Fascetti LeonPaediatric Surgery, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7175-3013
Eugenio BaraldiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most devastating gastrointestinal emergency in preterm neonates. Research on early predictive biomarkers is fundamental. This is a systematic review of studies applying untargeted metabolomics and gut microbiota analysis to evaluate the differences between neonates affected by NEC (Bell’s stage II or III), and/or by spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) versus healthy controls. Five studies applying metabolomics (43 cases, 95 preterm controls) and 20 applying gut microbiota analysis (254 cases, 651 preterm controls, 22 term controls) were selected. Metabolomic studies utilized NMR spectroscopy or mass spectrometry. An early urinary alanine/histidine ratio >4 showed good sensitivity and predictive value for NEC in one study. Samples collected in proximity to NEC diagnosis demonstrated variable pathways potentially related to NEC. In studies applying untargeted gut microbiota analysis, the sequencing of the V3−V4 or V3 to V5 regions of the 16S rRNA was the most used technique. At phylum level, NEC specimens were characterized by increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria compared to controls. At genus level, pre-NEC samples were characterized by a lack or decreased abundance of Bifidobacterium. Finally, at the species level Bacteroides dorei, Clostridium perfringens and perfringens-like strains dominated early NEC specimens, whereas Clostridium butyricum, neonatale and Propionibacterium acnei those at disease diagnosis. Six studies found a lower Shannon diversity index in cases than controls. A clear separation of cases from controls emerged based on UniFrac metrics in five out of seven studies. Importantly, no studies compared NEC versus SIP. Untargeted metabolomics and gut microbiota analysis are interrelated strategies to investigate NEC pathophysiology and identify potential biomarkers. Expression of quantitative measurements, data sharing via biorepositories and validation studies are fundamental to guarantee consistent comparison of results.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfant, Newborn, DiseasesIntestinal PerforationAlanineBiomarkersHistidineHumansInfant, NewbornMetabolomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAlanineBiomarkersHistidineRNA, Ribosomal, 16Smetabolomicsmicrobiotanecrotizing enterocolitispreterm birthspontaneous intestinal perforation

Identifiers

PMID36145235
PMCPMC9506026
OpenAlexW4296449493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.