Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145229›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Providing School Meals to All Students Free of Charge during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Challenges and Benefits Reported by School Foodservice Professionals in California.

Monica D Zuercher, Juliana F W Cohen, Christina E Hecht, Kenneth Hecht, Lorrene D Ritchie, Wendi Gosliner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monica D ZuercherNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-9807
Juliana F W CohenCenter for Health Inclusion, Research, and Practice (CHIRP), Department of Public Health and Nutrition, Merrimack College, North Andover, MA 01845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3145-6014
Christina E HechtNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Kenneth HechtNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Lorrene D RitchieNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8038-1821
Wendi GoslinerNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-9289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal school meals (USM) have the potential to increase access to healthy food for millions of U.S. students. This study evaluated school food authorities’ (SFA) perspectives of federal USM in response to COVID-19 (school year (SY) 2021−22) and California’s upcoming USM policy in the SY 2022−23. In February 2022, all SFAs in California (n = 1116) were invited to complete an online survey. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression examining differences by school demographic characteristics were used. Five hundred and eighty-one SFAs completed the survey; 63% of them first implemented USM during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reported benefits included increased student meal participation (79.2%) and reduced stigma (39.7%). Top challenges included staffing (76.9%) and meal packaging/solid waste (67.4%). Nearly all SFAs reported pandemic-related challenges procuring the necessary types (88.9%) and amounts of foods (85.9%), and non-food supplies/equipment (82.6%). Over 40% reported that federal reimbursements were insufficient to cover costs. SFAs with <40% FRPM-eligible students and/or higher student enrollment reported more current challenges and future concerns than those with ≥40% FRPMs and lower student enrollment. The top resources requested to implement CA’s USM included additional facilities/equipment (83.8%), communications/marketing (76.1%), increasing meal participation (71.5%), and financial management (61.5%). Most California SFAs reported that implementing federal USM had the intended effect of feeding more children. This study’s findings may be useful to the several other U.S. states implementing universal school meals in the SY 2022−23, and to other states or countries considering adopting a USM policy in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Food ServicesChildHumansLunchMealsPandemicsSolid WasteStudentsSolid Wastebreakfastchildrenlunchnutritionuniversal school meals

Identifiers

PMID36145229
PMCPMC9500887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.