Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36144868›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Graph Neural Network for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction: A Comparative Study.

Hang Zhou, Weikun Wang, Jiayun Jin, Zengwei Zheng, Binbin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Heterogeneous network approaches to protein pathway prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hang ZhouSchool of Computer and Computing Science, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China.
Weikun WangSchool of Computer and Computing Science, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China.
Jiayun JinSchool of Computer and Computing Science, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China.
Zengwei ZhengSchool of Computer and Computing Science, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0386-6080
Binbin ZhouSchool of Computer and Computing Science, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62102349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are the fundamental biological macromolecules which underline practically all biological activities. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs), as they are known, are how proteins interact with other proteins in their environment to perform biological functions. Understanding PPIs reveals how cells behave and operate, such as the antigen recognition and signal transduction in the immune system. In the past decades, many computational methods have been developed to predict PPIs automatically, requiring less time and resources than experimental techniques. In this paper, we present a comparative study of various graph neural networks for protein-protein interaction prediction. Five network models are analyzed and compared, including neural networks (NN), graph convolutional neural networks (GCN), graph attention networks (GAT), hyperbolic neural networks (HNN), and hyperbolic graph convolutions (HGCN). By utilizing the protein sequence information, all of these models can predict the interaction between proteins. Fourteen PPI datasets are extracted and utilized to compare the prediction performance of all these methods. The experimental results show that hyperbolic graph neural networks tend to have a better performance than the other methods on the protein-related datasets.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsAmino Acid SequenceProteinsgraph neural networksneural networksprotein–protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID36144868
PMCPMC9501426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.