Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36144420›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

The Effect of Anaerobically Cultivated Human Intestinal Microbiota Compared to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Gut Microbiota Profile and Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome, a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Tarek Mazzawi, Trygve Hausken, Per Førde Refsnes, Jan Gunnar Hatlebakk, Gülen Arslan Lied

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tarek MazzawiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7983-3707
Trygve HauskenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7080-8396
Per Førde RefsnesDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Jan Gunnar HatlebakkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Gülen Arslan LiedDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

Western Norway Regional Health Authority F-10463/4800001918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors has been shown to improve the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and changes the profile of the gut microbiota for the recipients. Alternatively, anaerobically cultivated human intestinal microbiota (ACHIM) can be used to manipulate the gut microbiota. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ACHIM suspension with donor-FMT and placebo (patient's own feces) to treat IBS. Out of the 62 originally included eligible patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS and their respective donors, only 43 patients completed the study by answering the questionnaires and delivering fecal samples before transplantation and after 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks. The patients were randomized into three subgroups for receiving ACHIM suspension (

Indexed as

16S rRNA sequencingACHIMFMTgut microbiotaIBS

Identifiers

PMID36144420
PMCPMC9503104
OpenAlexW4295850030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.