Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36144333›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Possibility of Using By-Products with High NDF Content to Alter the Fecal Short Chain Fatty Acid Profiles, Bacterial Community, and Digestibility of Lactating Dairy Cows.

Jiaying Lyu, Zhantao Yang, Erdan Wang, Gaokun Liu, Yajing Wang, Wei Wang, Shengli Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Indigo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiaying LyuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8606-9698
Zhantao YangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Erdan WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-3723
Gaokun LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yajing WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Shengli LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition

Funding

Beijing Key Research and Development Program Z191100004019023China Agricultural University the 2115 Talent Development ProgramThe earmarked fund for CARS36 the earmarked fund for CARS36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether agricultural by-products with a high NDF content and small-particle-size substitute for forage could cause hindgut acidosis and dysbacteriosis in lactating dairy cows. We investigated the impact of soybean hull and beet pulp on the fecal fermentation, bacterial community, and digestibility of cows. Sixteen lactating Holstein cows were treated as follows (% of dry matter (DM)): amount of by-product added was 0 (control, CON), 1.67% (low by-products, LB), 3.33% (medium by-products, MB), and 5% (high by-products, HB). The results showed the fecal pH of cows to be 7.23-7.29, implying no hindgut acidosis. With increased inclusion of by-products in the diets, the proportion of fecal propionate; relative abundance of the phylum

Indexed as

fecal bacteriafecal pHhindgutnon-forage fiber sources

Identifiers

PMID36144333
PMCPMC9505624
OpenAlexW4293760962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.