ArticleMicroorganisms2022
A Comparative Analysis of the Core Proteomes within and among the
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Orthology-based comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals conserved osmoadaptive responses in Bacillus velezensis and Bacillus paralicheniformis.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Morpho-biochemical and molecular identification of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus cereus isolates from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) rhizosphere.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic analyses provide new insights into phylogenetic and functional diversification in genusFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Exploring genetic diversity and genomic insights of Bacillus subtilis isolates from cassava rhizosphere using molecular barcoding and whole genome sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances and challenges in understanding evolution through genome comparison: meeting report of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) lecture course "Evolutionary and Comparative Genomics".Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Review
- pyPGCF: A Python Software for Phylogenomic Analysis, Species Demarcation, Identification of Core, and Fingerprint Proteins of Bacterial Genomes That Are Important for Plants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- A panoramic view of the genomic landscape of the genusMicrobial genomics · 2023Article
- Leveraging Scheme for Cross-Study Microbiome Machine Learning Prediction and Feature Evaluations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comprehensive genomic analysis ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Enzyme Profiling and Identification of Endophytic and Rhizospheric Bacteria Isolated fromMicroorganisms · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By integrating phylogenomic and comparative analyses of 1104 high-quality genome sequences, we identify the core proteins and the lineage-specific fingerprint proteins of the various evolutionary clusters (clades/groups/species) of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.