ReviewMetabolites2022
Identification of Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds Using Affinity Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Networking.
Review in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and metabolomic characterization of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (DT1) and Citrobacter braakii (S10) reveal functional traits for plant stress alleviation and sustainable agriculture.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Molecular pathways in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-plant interactions: a comprehensive review.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Breaking the boundaries of affinity selection-mass spectrometry: From ligand screening to target-ligand interaction insights.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
- Identifying Antihepatocellular Carcinoma Compounds in Gansui Banxia Decoction Using Live Cell Adsorption.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Bioactive compounds for human and planetary health.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Chemodiversity and Anti-Leukemia Effect of Metabolites fromMetabolites · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Affinity selection-mass spectrometry (AS-MS) is a label-free binding assay system that uses UHPLC-MS size-based separation methods to separate target-compound complexes from unbound compounds, identify bound compounds, classify compound binding sites, quantify the dissociation rate constant of compounds, and characterize affinity-extracted ligands. This label-free binding assay, in contrast to conventional biochemical (i.e., high-throughput screening (HTS)) approaches, is applicable to any drug target, and is also concise, accurate, and adaptable. Although AS-MS is an innovative approach for identifying lead compounds, the possibilities of finding bioactive compounds are limited by competitive binding, which occurs during the equilibration of extracts with the target protein(s). Here, we discuss the potential for metabolite profiling complemented with molecular networking to be used alongside AS-MS to improve the identification of bioactive compounds in plant extracts. AS-MS has gained significant prominence in HTS labs and shows potential to emerge as the driving force behind novel drug development in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.