ArticleMicromachines2022
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for EEG-Based Motor Decoding.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution Trend of Brain Science Research: An Integrated Bibliometric and Mapping Approach.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- MSEI-ENet: A Multi-Scale EEG-Inception Integrated Encoder Network for Motor Imagery EEG Decoding.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Brain-machine interface based on deep learning to control asynchronously a lower-limb robotic exoskeleton: a case-of-study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have been applied as a pattern recognition system for neuromodulation and neurorehabilitation. Decoding brain signals (e.g., EEG) with high accuracy is a prerequisite to building a reliable and practical BMI. This study presents a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for EEG-based motor decoding. Both upper-limb and lower-limb motor imagery were detected from this end-to-end learning with four datasets. An average classification accuracy of 93.36 ± 1.68% was yielded on the four datasets. We compared the proposed approach with two other models, i.e., multilayer perceptron and the state-of-the-art framework with common spatial patterns and support vector machine. We observed that the performance of the CNN-based framework was significantly better than the other two models. Feature visualization was further conducted to evaluate the discriminative channels employed for the decoding. We showed the feasibility of the proposed architecture to decode motor imagery from raw EEG data without manually designed features. With the advances in the fields of computer vision and speech recognition, deep learning can not only boost the EEG decoding performance but also help us gain more insight from the data, which may further broaden the knowledge of neuroscience for brain mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.