ArticleMicromachines2022
Evaluating and Visualizing the Contribution of ECG Characteristic Waveforms for PPG-Based Blood Pressure Estimation.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- MM-GradCAM: an improved multimodal GradCAM method with 1D and 2D ECG data for detection of cardiac arrhythmia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- BP-Net: Monitoring "Changes" in Blood Pressure Using PPG With Self-Contrastive Masking.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Article
- Smart Medical Evacuation Support System for the Military.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring is of great significance for the preventing, diagnosing, and treating of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Studies have demonstrated that photoplethysmogram (PPG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals can effectively and continuously predict blood pressure (BP). However, most of the BP estimation models focus on the waveform features of the PPG signal, while the peak value of R-wave in ECG is only used as a time reference, and few references investigated the ECG waveforms. This paper aims to evaluate the influence of three characteristic waveforms in ECG on the improvement of BP estimation. PPG is the primary signal, and five input combinations are formed by adding ECG, P wave, QRS complex, T wave, and none. We employ five common convolutional neural networks (CNN) to validate the consistency of the contribution. Meanwhile, with the visualization of Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM), we generate the heat maps and further visualize the distribution of CNN's attention to each waveform of PPG and ECG. The heat maps show that networks pay more attention to the QRS complex and T wave. In the comparison results, the QRS complex and T wave have more contribution to minimizing errors than P wave. By separately adding P wave, QRS complex, and T wave, the average MAE of these networks reaches 7.87 mmHg, 6.57 mmHg, and 6.21 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), and 4.27 mmHg, 3.65 mmHg, and 3.73 mmHg, respectively, for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The results of the experiment show that QRS complex and T wave deserves more attention and feature extraction like PPG waveform features in the continuous BP estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.