Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143959›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Intradiscal Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Yusuke Oshita, Daisuke Matsuyama, Daisuke Sakai, Jordy Schol, Eiki Shirasawa, Haruka Emori, Kazuyuki Segami, Shu Takahashi, Kazumichi Yagura, Masayuki Miyagi and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke OshitaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama 224-8503, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-2803
Daisuke MatsuyamaNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.
Daisuke SakaiNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4189-9270
Jordy ScholDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-2591
Eiki ShirasawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Haruka EmoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama 224-8503, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazuyuki SegamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shu TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-7548
Kazumichi YaguraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masayuki MiyagiNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3082-9739
Wataru SaitoNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takayuki ImuraNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.
Toshiyuki NakazawaNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.
Gen InoueNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-9004
Akihiko HiyamaNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2474-9118
Hiroyuki KatohNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0046-3008
Tsutomu AkazawaNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-0994
Koji KanzakiNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masato SatoNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4049-7325
Masashi TakasoNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masahiko WatanabeNonprofit Organization, Kanagawa Spine Research Society, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9038-0446
Kitasato University · JPTokai University · JPShowa University Fujigaoka Hospital · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Hadano Hospital · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Intradiscal injection of Condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase), a glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzyme, is employed as a minimally invasive treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and represents a promising option between conservative treatment and surgical intervention. Since its 2018 approval in Japan, multiple single-site trails have highlighted its effectiveness, however, the effect of LDH types, and influences of patient age, sex, etc., on treatment success remains unclear. Moreover, data on teenagers and elderly patients has not been reported. In this retrospective multi-center study, we sought to classify prognostic factors for successful condoliase treatment for LDH and assess its effect on patients < 20 and ≥70 years old. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 137 LDH patients treated through condoliase at four Japanese institutions and assessed its effectiveness among different age categories on alleviation of visual analog scale (VAS) of leg pain, low back pain and numbness, as well as ODI and JOA scores. Moreover, we divided them into either a “group-A” category if a ≥50% improvement in baseline leg pain VAS was observed or “group-N” if VAS leg pain improved <50%. Next, we assessed the differences in clinical and demographic distribution between group-A and group-N. Results: Fifty-five patients were classified as group-A (77.5%) and 16 patients were allocated to group-N (22.5%). A significant difference in Pfirrmann classification was found between both cohorts, with grade IV suggested to be most receptive. A posterior disc angle > 5° was also found to approach statical significance. In all age groups, average VAS scores showed improvement. However, 75% of adolescent patients showed deterioration in Pfirrmann classification following treatment. Conclusions: Intradiscal condoliase injection is an effective treatment for LDH, even in patients with large vertebral translation and posterior disc angles, regardless of age. However, since condoliase imposes a risk of progressing disc degeneration, its indication for younger patients remains controversial.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementLow Back PainAdolescentAgedChondroitin ABC LyaseGlycosaminoglycansHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChondroitin ABC LyaseGlycosaminoglycanscondoliaseintervertebral injection therapylow back painlumbar disc herniationminimally invasive treatment

Identifiers

PMID36143959
PMCPMC9501482
OpenAlexW4296282349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.