ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Technology of Manufacturing of ZC Cylindrical Worm.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cylindrical worms are generally machined by the hobbing method using rotary tools, and they are formed in the finishing pass at the full profile height. In this case, the profile of the tool-action surface determines the profile of the machined surface, and for technological reasons, a rectilinear (less frequently circular) axial profile of the tool-action surface is generally assumed. In the currently known technology, machining takes place on special machine tools, and on tools that are specially prepared for a specific outline. The research objective of the article is to present the possibility of creating a helical surface with a circular concave profile on a CNC lathe with a universal tool: a ball-end mill cutter. In the case of the proposed processing method, the surface of the worm is shaped with a spherical-end mill cutter in many passes, and its shape depends on the setting of the tool. This machining method must be performed on CNC machines, and the tool is not geometrically related to the shape of the machined profile. The paper presents the mathematical apparatus for generating a concave helical surface. Based on the calculations, the worm was processed with a spherical-end mill on a CLX350 V4 DMG MORI turning machining center. The surface-quality analysis was carried out on a contact profilographometer, while the dimensional accuracy was verified on a coordinate-measuring machine, and the maximum tolerance field of the measurement was 13 μm. On the basis of the measurements made, the accuracy of the worm outline is consistent with the theoretical assumptions. Using the presented method of machining, we can shape helical surfaces with an assumed profile in the axial section on a CNC machine tool with the use of universal tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.