ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Regenerative Potential of Decellularized Dental Pulp Extracellular Matrix: A Systematic Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Demineralization of Camel Dentin for Dental Tissue Engineering.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Extracellular Matrix-Based and Extracellular Matrix-Bioinspired Scaffolds for Extracellular Vesicle Delivery in Dental Pulp Regeneration: A Narrative Review.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Decellularized dental pulp extracellular matrix for pulp-dentin regeneration: a narrative review of processing, bioactivity, delivery, preclinical evidence, and translational challenges.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Biomimetic Coatings in Implant Dentistry: A Quick Update.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe regeneration of dental pulp remains a challenge. Although several treatment modalities have been proposed to promote pulpal regeneration, these treatments have several drawbacks. More recently, decellularized dental pulp extracellular matrix (DP-ECM) has been proposed to regenerate dental pulp. However, to date, no systematic review has summarized the overall outcome and assessed the available literature focusing on the endodontic use of DP-ECM. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the literature, summarize the overall outcomes, and provide clinical recommendations about DP-ECM. METHODOLOGY: Following the Participants Intervention Control and Outcomes (PICO) principle, a focused question was constructed before conducting a search of the literature and of electronic research databases and registers. The focused question was: 'Compared to controls, does decellularized dental pulp extracellular matrix (DP-ECM) stimulate the regeneration of dental pulp cells and tissue?' Quality assessment of the studies was carried out using Guidelines for Reporting Pre-Clinical in Vitro Studies on Dental Materials and ARRIVE guidelines.
results12 studies were included in this review. Data from five in vitro experiments and eight in vivo experiments were extracted and the quality of the experiments was assessed. In majority of the studies, DP-ECM appeared to have stimulated pulpal regeneration. However, several sources of bias and methodological deficiencies were found during the quality assessment.
conclusionWithin the limitations of this review and the included studies, it may be concluded that there is insufficient evidence to deduce the overall efficacy of DP-ECM for pulpal regeneration. More research, clinical and pre-clinical, is required for more conclusive evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.