Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143698›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Regenerative Potential of Decellularized Dental Pulp Extracellular Matrix: A Systematic Review.

Necdet Adanir, Zohaib Khurshid, Jithendra Ratnayake

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Biomimetic Coatings in Implant Dentistry: A Quick Update.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Necdet AdanirDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6235-3448
Zohaib KhurshidDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-7335
Jithendra RatnayakeFaculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-4472
King Faisal University · SAUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia 1043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe regeneration of dental pulp remains a challenge. Although several treatment modalities have been proposed to promote pulpal regeneration, these treatments have several drawbacks. More recently, decellularized dental pulp extracellular matrix (DP-ECM) has been proposed to regenerate dental pulp. However, to date, no systematic review has summarized the overall outcome and assessed the available literature focusing on the endodontic use of DP-ECM. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the literature, summarize the overall outcomes, and provide clinical recommendations about DP-ECM. METHODOLOGY: Following the Participants Intervention Control and Outcomes (PICO) principle, a focused question was constructed before conducting a search of the literature and of electronic research databases and registers. The focused question was: 'Compared to controls, does decellularized dental pulp extracellular matrix (DP-ECM) stimulate the regeneration of dental pulp cells and tissue?' Quality assessment of the studies was carried out using Guidelines for Reporting Pre-Clinical in Vitro Studies on Dental Materials and ARRIVE guidelines.

results12 studies were included in this review. Data from five in vitro experiments and eight in vivo experiments were extracted and the quality of the experiments was assessed. In majority of the studies, DP-ECM appeared to have stimulated pulpal regeneration. However, several sources of bias and methodological deficiencies were found during the quality assessment.

conclusionWithin the limitations of this review and the included studies, it may be concluded that there is insufficient evidence to deduce the overall efficacy of DP-ECM for pulpal regeneration. More research, clinical and pre-clinical, is required for more conclusive evidence.

Indexed as

dental pulp tissueendodonticsextracellular matrixpulp regenerationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36143698
PMCPMC9505725
OpenAlexW4295978173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.