Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143281›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Risk of Recurrence of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Claudia Mazo, Claudia Aura, Arman Rahman, William M Gallagher, Catherine Mooney

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenges and Opportunities for Data Science in Women's Health.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia MazoUCD School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1703-8964
Claudia AuraUCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Arman RahmanUCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-156X
William M GallagherUCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-5999
Catherine MooneyUCD School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-1364
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

Enterprise Ireland 713654Enterprise Ireland Disruptive Technologies Innovation Fund 2020Irish Cancer Society CCRC13GALScience Foundation Ireland 15/IA/3104Science Foundation Ireland 18/SPP/3522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common disease among women, with over 2.1 million new diagnoses each year worldwide. About 30% of patients initially presenting with early stage disease have a recurrence of cancer within 10 years. Predicting who will have a recurrence and who will not remains challenging, with consequent implications for associated treatment. Artificial intelligence strategies that can predict the risk of recurrence of breast cancer could help breast cancer clinicians avoid ineffective overtreatment. Despite its significance, most breast cancer recurrence datasets are insufficiently large, not publicly available, or imbalanced, making these studies more difficult. This systematic review investigates the role of artificial intelligence in the prediction of breast cancer recurrence. We summarise common techniques, features, training and testing methodologies, metrics, and discuss current challenges relating to implementation in clinical practice. We systematically reviewed works published between 1 January 2011 and 1 November 2021 using the methodology of Kitchenham and Charter. We leveraged Springer, Google Scholar, PubMed, and IEEE search engines. This review found three areas that require further work. First, there is no agreement on artificial intelligence methodologies, feature predictors, or assessment metrics. Second, issues such as sampling strategies, missing data, and class imbalance problems are rarely addressed or discussed. Third, representative datasets for breast cancer recurrence are scarce, which hinders model validation and deployment. We conclude that predicting breast cancer recurrence remains an open problem despite the use of artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancerfeature predictorsmachine learningrisk of recurrencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36143281
PMCPMC9500690
OpenAlexW4296004454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.