ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Deep Learning on Basal Cell Carcinoma In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Data.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning analysis of reflectance confocal microscopy for basal cell carcinoma diagnosis.JAAD international · 2026Article
- AI-assisted basal cell carcinoma diagnosis with LC-OCT: A multicentric retrospective study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Surgical Margin Assessment of High-Risk Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in the Surgical Treatment of Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Possible Explanations for Rising Melanoma Rates Despite Increased Sunscreen Use over the Past Several Decades.Cancers · 2023Article
- Insight on common forms of cutaneous head and neck carcinoma (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtended skin malignancies of the head and neck region are among the most common cancer types and are associated with numerous diagnostic and therapeutical problems. The radical resection of skin cancer in the facial area often leads to severe functional and aesthetic impairment, and precise margin assessments can avoid the extensive safety margins. On the other hand, the complete removal of the cancer is essential to minimize the risk of recurrence. Reliable intraoperative assessments of the wound margins could overcome this discrepancy between minimal invasiveness and safety distance in the head and neck region. With the help of reflectance confocal laser microscopy (RCM), cells can be visualized in high resolution intraoperatively. The combination with deep learning and automated algorithms allows an investigator independent and objective interpretation of specific confocal imaging data. Therefore, we aimed to apply a deep learning algorithm to detect malignant areas in images obtained via in vivo confocal microscopy. We investigated basal cell carcinoma (BCC), as one of the most common entities with well-described in vivo RCM diagnostic criteria, within a preliminary feasibility study. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe included 62 patients with histologically confirmed BCC in the head and neck region. All patients underwent in vivo confocal laser microscope scanning. Approximately 382 images with BCC structures could be obtained, annotated, and proceeded for further deep learning model training.
resultsA sensitivity of 46% and a specificity of 85% in detecting BCC regions could be achieved using a convolutional neural network model ("MobileNet").
conclusionThe preliminary results reveal the potential and limitations of the automated detection of BCC with in vivo RCM. Further studies with a larger number of cases are required to obtain better predictability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.