ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
A Quantitative and Qualitative Clinical Validation of Soft Tissue Simulation for Orthognathic Surgery Planning.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Maxillofacial Surgery: Data Availability and Evidence Maturity.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- The Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Simulation in Orthognathic Surgery-A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to perform a quantitative and qualitative validation of a soft tissue simulation pipeline for orthognathic surgery planning, necessary for clinical use. Simulation results were retrospectively obtained in 10 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery. Quantitatively, error was measured at 9 anatomical landmarks for each patient and different types of comparative analysis were performed considering two mesh resolutions, clinically accepted error, simulation time and error measured by means of percentage of the whole surface. Qualitatively, evaluation and binary questions were asked to two surgeons, both before and after seeing the actual surgical outcome, and their answers were compared. Finally, the quantitative and qualitative results were compared to check if these two types of validation are correlated. The quantitative results were accurate, with greater errors corresponding to gonions and lower lip. Qualitatively, surgeons answered similarly mostly and their evaluations improved when seeing the actual outcome of the surgery. The quantitative validation was not correlated to the qualitative validation. In this study, quantitative and qualitative validations were performed and compared, and the need to carry out both types of analysis in validation studies of soft tissue simulation software for orthognathic surgery planning was proved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.