Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143174›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Prospective Evaluation of Two Wall Orbital Fractures Involving the Medial Orbital Wall: PSI Reconstruction versus PDS Repair-Worth the Effort?

Max Wilkat, Karsten Hufendiek, Merve Karahisarlioglu, Maria Borrelli, Christoph Sproll, Majeed Rana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Max WilkatDepartment for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Karsten HufendiekUniversity Eye Hospital, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3996-7844
Merve KarahisarliogluDepartment for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Maria BorrelliDepartment for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christoph SprollDepartment for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8637-9255
Majeed RanaDepartment for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper treatment of the two-wall fractured orbit is still controversial. Specifically, there is no consensus on the issue of the necessity of medial orbital wall repair. With anatomically critical structures at risk during the surgical approach, surgeons' view on the necessity of medial orbital wall repair often is restricted and an aesthetically disturbing enophthalmos is more likely to be accepted. Therefore, treatment options range from leaving the medial wall without repair to reconstruction with autogenous tissue or alloplastic materials, which can lead to moderate to severe side effects. However, emerging technologies such as patient-specific implants (PSI) offer a reliable and anatomically correct reconstruction of the bony orbit. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of full orbital reconstruction using PSIs compared to only orbital floor repair using PDS (bioresorbable polydioxanone) foils leaving the medial orbital wall untouched in traumatic two-wall orbital fractures. Of all patients treated at the University Hospital of Düsseldorf between 2017 and 2019 who suffered from traumatic orbital fracture, only patients with a two-wall orbital fracture involving both the orbital floor and the medial wall (n = 68) were included. Patients were treated either with a PSI (n = 35) or a PDS foil (n = 33). Primary outcome parameters were ophthalmological disturbances analyzed via clinical investigation and intra-orbital angles, volumes and implant position analyzed with radiological 3D-datasets. While a two-wall reconstruction using PSIs led to a significant improvement of the enophthalmos, the rate of postoperative enophthalmos was significantly increased in cases of only orbital floor repair with PDS foils. Radiologically, a significant reconstruction of the three-dimensional bony orbit succeeded with the simple use of PSIs leading to a significant reduction in the traumatically enlarged orbital volume. PSI also led to a significant reduction in the traumatically enlarged medial angle of the orbit. This was not the case for single-floor repair with PDS foil. The results of this study suggest that complex orbital fractures can be reconstructed at an even higher degree of accuracy with selective laser-melted PSIs than PDS foils. In order to achieve a true to original reconstruction of the bony orbit, surgical treatment of the medial orbital wall can be advocated for in the long term depending on the indication.

Indexed as

medial orbital wallorbital reconstructionorbital wall fracturepatient specific implantpolydioxanone foil

Identifiers

PMID36143174
PMCPMC9500717
OpenAlexW4293758608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.