Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143154›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Real-World Testing of a Machine Learning-Derived Visual Scale for Tc99m TRODAT-1 for Diagnosing Lewy Body Disease: Comparison with a Traditional Approach Using Semiquantification.

Pai-Yi Chiu, Po-Nien Hou, Guang-Uei Hung, Te-Chun Hsieh, Pak-Ki Chan, Chia-Hung Kao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of parkinson's disease with neuroimaging modalities using machine learning and artificial intelligence: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pai-Yi ChiuDepartment of Neurology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 50008, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-4516
Po-Nien HouDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 50544, Taiwan.
Guang-Uei HungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 50544, Taiwan.
Te-Chun HsiehDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-7683
Pak-Ki ChanCenter of Augmented Intelligence in Healthcare, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Chia-Hung KaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-3676
Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital · TWChina Medical University · TWAsia University · TWTunghai University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Abnormal dopamine transporter (DAT) uptake is an important biomarker for diagnosing Lewy body disease (LBD), including Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We evaluated a machine learning-derived visual scale (ML-VS) for Tc99m TRODAT-1 from one center and compared it with the striatal/background ratio (SBR) using semiquantification for diagnosing LBD in two other centers. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a history-based computerized dementia diagnostic system. MT-VS and SBR among normal controls (NCs) and patients with PD, PD with dementia (PDD), DLB, or Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were compared. Results: We included 715 individuals, including 122 NCs, 286 patients with PD, 40 with AD, 179 with DLB, and 88 with PDD. Compared with NCs, patients with PD exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal DAT uptake using all methods. Compared with the AD group, PDD and DLB groups exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal DAT uptake using all methods. The distribution of ML-VS was significantly different between PD and NC, DLB and AD, and PDD and AD groups (all p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient of ML-VS/SBR in all participants was 0.679. Conclusions: The ML-VS designed in one center is useful for differentiating PD from NC, DLB from AD, and PDD from AD in other centers. Its correlation with traditional approaches using different scanning machines is also acceptable. Future studies should develop models using data pools from multiple centers for increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedementia with Lewy bodiesLewy body diseasemachine learningParkinson’s diseaseTc99m TRODAT-1

Identifiers

PMID36143154
PMCPMC9505116
OpenAlexW4293217811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.