Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143144›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Data Mining.

Amjad Zia, Muzzamil Aziz, Ioana Popa, Sabih Ahmed Khan, Amirreza Fazely Hamedani, Abdul R Asif

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amjad ZiaDepartment for Clinical Chemistry/Interdisciplinary UMG Laboratories, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3034-3181
Muzzamil AzizFuture Networks, eScience Group, Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen (GWDG), 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Ioana PopaDepartment for Clinical Chemistry/Interdisciplinary UMG Laboratories, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Sabih Ahmed KhanFuture Networks, eScience Group, Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen (GWDG), 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Amirreza Fazely HamedaniFuture Networks, eScience Group, Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen (GWDG), 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Abdul R AsifDepartment for Clinical Chemistry/Interdisciplinary UMG Laboratories, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 16KIS1292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding published unstructured textual data using traditional text mining approaches and tools is becoming a challenging issue due to the rapid increase in electronic open-source publications. The application of data mining techniques in the medical sciences is an emerging trend; however, traditional text-mining approaches are insufficient to cope with the current upsurge in the volume of published data. Therefore, artificial intelligence-based text mining tools are being developed and used to process large volumes of data and to explore the hidden features and correlations in the data. This review provides a clear-cut and insightful understanding of how artificial intelligence-based data-mining technology is being used to analyze medical data. We also describe a standard process of data mining based on CRISP-DM (Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining) and the most common tools/libraries available for each step of medical data mining.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehealthcare informationmachine learningmedical datatext mining

Identifiers

PMID36143144
PMCPMC9501106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.