Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143127›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Can Swallowing Cerebral Neurophysiology Be Evaluated during Ecological Food Intake Conditions? A Systematic Literature Review.

Yohan Gallois, Fabrice Neveu, Muriel Gabas, Xavier Cormary, Pascal Gaillard, Eric Verin, Renée Speyer, Virginie Woisard

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Classifying neurogenic dysphagia as a movement disorder.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Yohan GalloisLaboratory LNPL-UR4156, University of Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3197-8290
Fabrice NeveuIndependent Researcher, Swallis Medical, 31770 Colomiers, France.
Muriel GabasLaboratory CERTOP-UMR CNRS 5044, Maison de la Recherche, University of Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse, France.
Xavier CormaryIndependent Researcher, 31600 Muret, France.
Pascal GaillardLaboratory CLLE CNRS UMR5263, University of Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse, France.
Eric VerinDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France.
Renée SpeyerDepartment Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2828-8897
Virginie WoisardLaboratory LNPL-UR4156, University of Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Larrey · FRLeiden University · NLUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversité Toulouse - Jean Jaurès · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swallowing is a complex function that relies on both brainstem and cerebral control. Cerebral neurofunctional evaluations are mostly based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), performed with the individual laying down; which is a non-ecological/non-natural position for swallowing. According to the PRISMA guidelines, a review of the non-invasive non-radiating neurofunctional tools, other than fMRI and PET, was conducted to explore the cerebral activity in swallowing during natural food intake, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Using Embase and PubMed, we included human studies focusing on neurofunctional imaging during an ecologic swallowing task. From 5948 unique records, we retained 43 original articles, reporting on three different techniques: electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS). During swallowing, all three techniques showed activity of the pericentral cortex. Variations were associated with the modality of the swallowing process (volitional or non-volitional) and the substance used (mostly water and saliva). All techniques have been used in both healthy and pathological conditions to explore the precise time course, localization or network structure of the swallowing cerebral activity, sometimes even more precisely than fMRI. EEG and MEG are the most advanced and mastered techniques but fNIRS is the most ready-to-use and the most therapeutically promising. Ongoing development of these techniques will support and improve our future understanding of the cerebral control of swallowing.

Indexed as

cerebral activityelectroencephalographyfNIRSmagnetoencephalographyswallowing function

Identifiers

PMID36143127
PMCPMC9505443
OpenAlexW4296357205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.