Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143042›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Does Bicanalicular Intubation Improve the Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy?

Petr Matoušek, Jakub Lubojacký, Michaela Masárová, Lenka Čábalová, Stanislav Červenka, Pavel Komínek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy with or without stent Insertion-A systematic review and Meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. A critical update on endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petr MatoušekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0930-6773
Jakub LubojackýDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Michaela MasárováDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lenka ČábalováDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2117-040X
Stanislav ČervenkaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Pavel KomínekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
University of Ostrava · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZ

Funding

Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization FNOs/2019 FNOs/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the success of endoscopic dacryocystorinostomy with and without bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of distal nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

methodsIn a prospective, randomized, comparative study, endoscopic dacryocystorinostomy without bicanalicular silicone intubation (Group I) and endoscopic dacryocystorinostomy with intubation (Group II) were performed in patients with distal nasolacrimal duct obstructions. The tubes were removed 3 months after surgery in Group II, and the patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery. Therapeutic success was defined as the fluorescein dye disappearance test grade 0-1 corresponding with a complete resolution of symptoms.

resultsThirty patients, aged 23-86 years, were included in the study. The success rate was 13/15 (86.67%) in Group I and in 14/15 (93.33%) in Group II. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (

conclusionsBicanalicular intubation does not significantly increase the success rate of EDCR in distal nasolacrimal obstruction in adults.

Indexed as

bicanalicular intubationdistal nasolacrimal duct obstructionendoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Identifiers

PMID36143042
PMCPMC9505999
OpenAlexW4295978335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.