Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142951›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

How Does Orthodontic Mini-Implant Thread Minidesign Influence the Stability?-Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Maciej Jedliński, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska, Marta Mazur, Katarzyna Grocholewicz, Pedro Suárez Suquía, David Suárez Quintanilla

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06743360 (Microanalysis of Changes in 3D Geometry of Orthodontic Mini-implants After Insertion), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06743360 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Microanalysis of Changes in 3D Geometry of Orthodontic Mini-implants After Insertion

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPomeranian Medical University SzczecinRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsMalocclusions, Malocclusion, Angle Class I, Malocclusion, Angle Class IIArmsInsertion, Scanning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development and in vitro testing of an orthodontic miniscrew for use in the mandible.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tooth Complications after Orthodontic Miniscrews Insertion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maciej JedlińskiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3446-6119
Joanna Janiszewska-OlszowskaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4374-2568
Marta MazurDepartment of Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0525-681X
Katarzyna GrocholewiczDepartment of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Pedro Suárez SuquíaDepartment of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
David Suárez QuintanillaDepartment of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical guidelines are lacking for the use of orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs) in terms of scientific evidence referring to the choice of proper mini-design. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate to what extent orthodontic mini-implant thread design influences its stability.

methodsSearch was conducted in five search engines on 10 May. Quality assessment was performed using study type specific scales. Whenever possible, meta-analysis was performed.

resultsThe search strategy identified 118 potential articles. Twenty papers were subjected to qualitative analysis and data from 8 papers-to meta-analysis. Studies included were characterized by high or medium quality. Four studies were considered as low quality. No clinical studies considering the number of threads, threads depth, or TSF have been found in the literature.

conclusionsMinidesign of OMIs seems to influence their stability in the bone. Thread pitch seems to be of special importance for OMIs retention-the more dense thread-the better stability. Thread depth seems to be of low importance for OMIs stability. There is no clear scientific evidence for optimal thread shape factor. Studies present in the literature vary greatly in study design and results reporting. Research received no external funding. Study protocol number in PROSPERO database: CRD42022340970.

Indexed as

anchoragedesignorthodontic mini-implantstabilitytemporary anchorage devicethread

Identifiers

PMID36142951
PMCPMC9506209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.