ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Pediatric Anaphylaxis: A 20-Year Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Updates in the Management of Anaphylaxis: The Role of the Pediatrician.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2026Article
- Incidence and clinical management of paediatric emergency presentations of anaphylaxis in Alberta.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- Health inequities in pediatric anaphylaxis: A policy framework and call to action for equitable care from SIAIP allergy prevention commission.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Management of paediatric anaphylaxis: evaluation of clinical practice according to the 2024 Polish Paediatric Society guidelines.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026Article
- A reference centre experience in central Anatolia in terms of causes, severity and treatment of childhood anaphylaxis.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2025Article
- Food allergy: cause or consequence of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis? Potential implications of ultraprocessed foods in prevention and management.Frontiers in allergy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnaphylaxis is a steadily increasing global problem defined as an acute hypersensitivity multisystem reaction that is potentially fatal. In the pediatric age, the leading cause is food. In other allergic diseases, intrinsic heterogeneity has been reported in the clinical presentation, severity, and triggers of anaphylaxis. This study analyzes the features and management approach of the anaphylactic reactions in children evaluated at the pediatric clinic in Pavia. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients with anaphylaxis between 2001 and 2021.
resultsA total of 148 patients with a median age of 5 years were enrolled, and 80% of the patients had other atopic comorbidities that were correlated with the severity of anaphylaxis. The main trigger of anaphylaxis was food. Most reactions involved mucocutaneous, respiratory, and gastrointestinal systems, and occurred at home. Adrenaline was administered only in a minority of cases.
conclusionsConsidering that anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt management, the use of adrenaline should be implemented. Our data also suggest the importance of educating and spreading awareness of anaphylactic management within the medical community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.