ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Signatures of Co-Deregulated Genes and Their Transcriptional Regulators in Lung Cancer.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- KAT2A: a prognostic biomarker influencing proliferation and immune escape in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Assessment of MXD3 Expression as a Predictor of Survival in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of genomics · 2025Article
- Shared and specific competing endogenous RNAs network mining in four digestive system tumors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- The bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation of the carcinogenic role of EXO1 in lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Screening Key Genes and Biological Pathways in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the significant progress made towards comprehending the deregulated signatures in lung cancer, these vary from study to study. We reanalyzed 25 studies from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to detect and annotate co-deregulated signatures in lung cancer and in single-gene or single-drug perturbation experiments. We aimed to decipher the networks that these co-deregulated genes (co-DEGs) form along with their upstream regulators. Differential expression and upstream regulators were computed using Characteristic Direction and Systems Biology tools, including GEO2Enrichr and X2K. Co-deregulated gene expression profiles were further validated across different molecular and immune subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUAD) and lung adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUSC) datasets, as well as using immunohistochemistry data from the Human Protein Atlas, before being subjected to subsequent GO and KEGG enrichment analysis. The functional alterations of the co-upregulated genes in lung cancer were mostly related to immune response regulating the cell surface signaling pathway, in contrast to the co-downregulated genes, which were related to S-nitrosylation. Networks of hub proteins across the co-DEGs consisted of overlapping TFs (SOX2, MYC, KAT2A) and kinases (MAPK14, CSNK2A1 and CDKs). Furthermore, using Connectivity Map we highlighted putative repurposing drugs, including valproic acid, betonicine and astemizole. Similarly, we analyzed the co-DEG signatures in single-gene and single-drug perturbation experiments in lung cancer cell lines. In summary, we identified critical co-DEGs in lung cancer providing an innovative framework for their potential use in developing personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.