ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
A Novel Approach of SWATH-Based Metabolomics Analysis Using the Human Metabolome Database Spectral Library.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a metabolomic LC-QTOF method for bioactive compound production control in plant cell cultures.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Chemical Profiling and Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms ofMetabolites · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Metabolomic Analysis of Saliva Using SWATH-DIA Reveals Systemic Metabolic Adaptations to Exercise.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics analysis of autism spectrum disorder reveals unique microbial macromolecules interactions.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Untargeted metabolomics analysis of metabolite changes in gastric cancer patients from plateau regions.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- In-depth profile of biosignatures for T2DM cohort utilizing an integrated targeted LC-MS platform.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Integrated multiomics analysis to infer COVID-19 biological insights.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Unveiling Microbial Chemical Interactions Based on Metabolomics Approaches.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolomics is a potential approach to paving new avenues for clinical diagnosis, molecular medicine, and therapeutic drug monitoring and development. The conventional metabolomics analysis pipeline depends on the data-independent acquisition (DIA) technique. Although powerful, it still suffers from stochastic, non-reproducible ion selection across samples. Despite the presence of different metabolomics workbenches, metabolite identification remains a tedious and time-consuming task. Consequently, sequential windowed acquisition of all theoretical MS (SWATH) acquisition has attracted much attention to overcome this limitation. This article aims to develop a novel SWATH platform for data analysis with a generation of an accurate mass spectral library for metabolite identification using SWATH acquisition. The workflow was validated using inclusion/exclusion compound lists. The false-positive identification was 3.4% from the non-endogenous drugs with 96.6% specificity. The workflow has proven to overcome background noise despite the complexity of the SWATH sample. From the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), 1282 compounds were tested in various biological samples to demonstrate the feasibility of the workflow. The current study identified 377 compounds in positive and 303 in negative modes with 392 unique non-redundant metabolites. Finally, a free software tool, SASA, was developed to analyze SWATH-acquired samples using the proposed pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.