Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142721›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Chloroplast Genome Annotation Tools: Prolegomena to the Identification of Inverted Repeats.

Ante Turudić, Zlatko Liber, Martina Grdiša, Jernej Jakše, Filip Varga, Zlatko Šatović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of the Chloroplast Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ante TurudićCentre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv), Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-9456-4963
Zlatko LiberFaculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-2370-6650
Martina GrdišaCentre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv), Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4584-4851
Jernej JakšeBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-1627
Filip VargaCentre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv), Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-7174-8866
Zlatko ŠatovićCentre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv), Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9848-1601

Funding

Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding, Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv), Zagreb, Croatia KK.01.1.1.01.0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of next-generation sequencing technology and the increasing amount of sequencing data have brought the bioinformatic tools used in genome assembly into focus. The final step of the process is genome annotation, which works on assembled genome sequences to identify the location of genome features. In the case of organelle genomes, specialized annotation tools are used to identify organelle genes and structural features. Numerous annotation tools target chloroplast sequences. Most chloroplast DNA genomes have a quadripartite structure caused by two copies of a large inverted repeat. We investigated the strategies of six annotation tools (Chloë, Chloroplot, GeSeq, ORG.Annotate, PGA, Plann) for identifying inverted repeats and analyzed their success using publicly available complete chloroplast sequences of taxa belonging to the asterid and rosid clades. The annotation tools use two different approaches to identify inverted repeats, using existing general search tools or implementing stand-alone solutions. The chloroplast sequences studied show that there are different types of imperfections in the assembled data and that each tool performs better on some sequences than the others.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastChloroplastsDNA, ChloroplastMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyDNA, Chloroplastannotationchloroplast genomeinverted repeatsrepeat identification

Identifiers

PMID36142721
PMCPMC9503105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.