Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142711›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

ProTstab2 for Prediction of Protein Thermal Stabilities.

Yang Yang, Jianjun Zhao, Lianjie Zeng, Mauno Vihinen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proteome-wide analysis of protein stability in Escherichia coli under acid stress.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ESMStabP: A Regression Model for Protein Thermostability Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting absolute protein folding stability using generative models.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fluorescence-Based Protein Stability Monitoring-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang YangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4397-8215
Jianjun ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Lianjie ZengSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Mauno VihinenDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, BMC B13, Lund University, SE-22184 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9614-7976
Soochow University · CNLund University · SE

Funding

Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization No noNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Instituteion of China 20KJA520010Swedish Cancer Society CAN 20 1350Vetenskapsrådet 2019-01403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stability of proteins is an essential property that has several biological implications. Knowledge about protein stability is important in many ways, ranging from protein purification and structure determination to stability in cells and biotechnological applications. Experimental determination of thermal stabilities has been tedious and available data have been limited. The introduction of limited proteolysis and mass spectrometry approaches has facilitated more extensive cellular protein stability data production. We collected melting temperature information for 34,913 proteins and developed a machine learning predictor, ProTstab2, by utilizing a gradient boosting algorithm after testing seven algorithms. The method performance was assessed on a blind test data set and showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.753 and root mean square error of 7.005. Comparison to previous methods indicated that ProTstab2 had superior performance. The method is fast, so it was applied to predict and compare the stabilities of all proteins in human, mouse, and zebrafish proteomes for which experimental data were not determined. The tool is freely available.

Indexed as

ProteomeZebrafishAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansMachine LearningMiceProtein StabilityProteomeartificial intelligencegradient boostingmachine learning predictorprotein cellular stabilityprotein propertystability prediction

Identifiers

PMID36142711
PMCPMC9505338
OpenAlexW4296354070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.