Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142675›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Polymicrobial Biofilm Organization of

Cassandra Pouget, Catherine Dunyach-Remy, Chloé Magnan, Alix Pantel, Albert Sotto, Jean-Philippe Lavigne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MRSA-dominant colonization and synergistic pathogenicity withJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. L-Fucose-Dependent Biofilm Formation bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cassandra PougetBacterial Virulence and Chronic Infections, INSERM U1047, Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, CEDEX 09, 30029 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-7819
Catherine Dunyach-RemyBacterial Virulence and Chronic Infections, INSERM U1047, Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, CEDEX 09, 30029 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6884-470X
Chloé MagnanBacterial Virulence and Chronic Infections, INSERM U1047, Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, CEDEX 09, 30029 Nîmes, France.
Alix PantelBacterial Virulence and Chronic Infections, INSERM U1047, Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, CEDEX 09, 30029 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2317-4199
Albert SottoBacterial Virulence and Chronic Infections, INSERM U1047, Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, CEDEX 09, 30029 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-9386
Jean-Philippe LavigneBacterial Virulence and Chronic Infections, INSERM U1047, Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, CEDEX 09, 30029 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9484-0304

Funding

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes Thematique Phare 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm on the skin surface of chronic wounds is an important step that involves difficulties in wound healing. The polymicrobial nature inside this pathogenic biofilm is key to understanding the chronicity of the lesion. Few in vitro models have been developed to study bacterial interactions inside this chronic wound. We evaluated the biofilm formation and the evolution of bacteria released from this biofilm on the two main bacteria isolated in this condition, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using a dynamic system (BioFlux™ 200) and a chronic wound-like medium (CWM) that mimics the chronic wound environment. We observed that all species constituted a faster biofilm in the CWM compared to a traditional culture medium (p < 0.01). The percentages of biofilm formation were significantly higher in the mixed biofilm compared to those determined for the bacterial species alone (p < 0.01). Biofilm organization was a non-random structure where S. aureus aggregates were located close to the wound surface, whereas P. aeruginosa was located deeper in the wound bed. Planktonic biofilm-detached bacteria showed decreased growth, overexpression of genes encoding biofilm formation, and an increase in the mature biofilm biomass formed. Our data confirmed the impact of the chronic wound environment on biofilm formation and on bacterial lifecycle inside the biofilm.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcal InfectionsBiofilmsHumansStaphylococcus aureusWound HealingbiofilmBioFluxTM 200chronic woundsgene expressionlive imagingplanktonic bacteria releasedPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID36142675
PMCPMC9504628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.