ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
PSP-GNM: Predicting Protein Stability Changes upon Point Mutations with a Gaussian Network Model.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- MuFaDDG: a sequence-based multiscale feature fusion framework for protein stability changes prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Balancing the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy by affinity combination.Nature communications · 2026Article
- DDGWizard: Integration of feature calculation resources for analysis and prediction of changes in protein thermostability upon point mutations.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- The landscape of rare mitochondrial DNA variants in sudden cardiac death: A potential role for ATP synthase.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Mutation/metal deficiency in the "electrostatic loop" enhanced aggregation process in apo/holo SOD1 variants: implications for ALS diseases.BMC chemistry · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the effects of missense mutations on protein stability is a widely acknowledged significant biological problem. Genomic missense mutations may alter one or more amino acids, leading to increased or decreased stability of the encoded proteins. In this study, we describe a novel approach-Protein Stability Prediction with a Gaussian Network Model (PSP-GNM)-to measure the unfolding Gibbs free energy change (ΔΔG) and evaluate the effects of single amino acid substitutions on protein stability. Specifically, PSP-GNM employs a coarse-grained Gaussian Network Model (GNM) that has interactions between amino acids weighted by the Miyazawa-Jernigan statistical potential. We used PSP-GNM to simulate partial unfolding of the wildtype and mutant protein structures, and then used the difference in the energies and entropies of the unfolded wildtype and mutant proteins to calculate ΔΔG. The extent of the agreement between the ΔΔG calculated by PSP-GNM and the experimental ΔΔG was evaluated on three benchmark datasets: 350 forward mutations (S350 dataset), 669 forward and reverse mutations (S669 dataset) and 611 forward and reverse mutations (S611 dataset). We observed a Pearson correlation coefficient as high as 0.61, which is comparable to many of the existing state-of-the-art methods. The agreement with experimental ΔΔG further increased when we considered only those measurements made close to 25 °C and neutral pH, suggesting dependence on experimental conditions. We also assessed for the antisymmetry (ΔΔG
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.