Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142239›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Bioactive Composite for Orbital Floor Repair and Regeneration.

Fahad Al-Hamoudi, Hamza U Rehman, Yasir A Almoshawah, Abdullah C S Talari, Aqif A Chaudhry, Gwendolen C Reilly, Ihtesham U Rehman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bioprinting for craniofacial reconstruction: A review of advancements, clinical use, and challenges.Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fahad Al-HamoudiDental Technology Department, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-1787
Hamza U RehmanLeeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Nhs Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
Yasir A AlmoshawahBioengineering, School of Engineering, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-0327
Abdullah C S TalariBioengineering, School of Engineering, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.
Aqif A ChaudhryInterdisciplinary Research Center in Biomedical Materials (IRCBM), CUI, Lahore Campus, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Gwendolen C ReillyINSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, The Pam Liversidge Building, The Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-1071
Ihtesham U RehmanBioengineering, School of Engineering, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2502-7608
Lancaster University · GBInsigneo · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GBShaqra University · SA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the maxillofacial area, specifically the orbital floor, injuries can cause bone deformities in the head and face that are difficult to repair or regenerate. Treatment methodologies include use of polymers, metal, ceramics on their own and in combinations mainly for repair purposes, but little attention has been paid to identify suitable materials for orbital floor regeneration. Polyurethane (PU) and hydroxyapatite (HA) micro- or nano- sized with different percentages (25%, 40% & 60%) were used to fabricate bioactive tissue engineering (TE) scaffolds using solvent casting and particulate leaching methods. Mechanical and physical characterisation of TE scaffolds was investigated by tensile tests and SEM respectively. Chemical and structural properties of PU and PU/HA scaffolds were evaluated by infrared (IR) spectroscopy and Surface properties of the bioactive scaffold were analysed using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) sampling accessory coupled with IR. Cell viability, collagen formed, VEGF protein amount and vascularisation of bioactive TE scaffold were studied. IR characterisation confirmed the integration of HA in composite scaffolds, while ATR confirmed the significant amount of HA present at the top surface of the scaffold, which was a primary objective. The SEM images confirmed the pores' interconnectivity. Increasing the content of HA up to 40% led to an improvement in mechanical properties, and the incorporation of nano-HA was more promising than that of micro-HA. Cell viability assays (using MG63) confirmed biocompatibility and CAM assays confirmed vascularization, demonstrating that HA enhances vascularization. These properties make the resulting biomaterials very useful for orbital floor repair and regeneration.

Indexed as

PolyurethanesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCollagenDurapatitePorositySolventsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenDurapatitePolyurethanesSolventsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aangiogenesisbioactive compositeblowout fractureex-ovo chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assayhydroxyapatitepolyurethanerepair and regeneration

Identifiers

PMID36142239
PMCPMC9499648
OpenAlexW4294938795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.