Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142233›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Comparative Analysis of

Alexander V Shabaev, Konstantin V Moiseenko, Olga A Glazunova, Olga S Savinova, Tatyana V Fedorova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. An Investigation of the Secretome Composition ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander V ShabaevA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin V MoiseenkoA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-3641
Olga A GlazunovaA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9001-4072
Olga S SavinovaA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana V FedorovaA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0355-6800
A N Bach Institute of Biochemistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White-rot basidiomycete fungi are a unique group of organisms that evolved an unprecedented arsenal of extracellular enzymes for an efficient degradation of all components of wood such as cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. The exoproteomes of white-rot fungi represent a natural enzymatic toolbox for white biotechnology. Currently, only exoproteomes of a narrow taxonomic group of white-rot fungi-fungi belonging to the Polyporales order-are extensively studied. In this article, two white-rot fungi,

Indexed as

LigninPolyporalesBasidiomycotaCelluloseFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideFungal ProteinsFungiIsoenzymesLaccasePeroxidasesPolyporaceaePolysaccharidesTrametesCelluloseFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideFungal ProteinsIsoenzymesLaccaseLigninPeroxidasesPolysaccharidesexoproteomelignocellulosePeniophora lycii LE-BIN 2142secretomeTrametes hirsuta LE-BIN 072white-rot fungi

Identifiers

PMID36142233
PMCPMC9499651
OpenAlexW4294938634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.