Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142219›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

The Entero-Mammary Pathway and Perinatal Transmission of Gut Microbiota and SARS-CoV-2.

Carmen Josefina Juárez-Castelán, Juan Manuel Vélez-Ixta, Karina Corona-Cervantes, Alberto Piña-Escobedo, Yair Cruz-Narváez, Alejandro Hinojosa-Velasco, María Esther Landero-Montes-de-Oca, Eduardo Davila-Gonzalez, Eduardo González-Del-Olmo, Fernando Bastida-Gonzalez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen Josefina Juárez-CastelánDepartamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Cinvestav, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.
Juan Manuel Vélez-IxtaDepartamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Cinvestav, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5713-0776
Karina Corona-CervantesDepartamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Cinvestav, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1370-9601
Alberto Piña-EscobedoDepartamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Cinvestav, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.
Yair Cruz-NarváezLaboratorio de Posgrado de Operaciones Unitarias, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Química e Industrias Extractivas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México 07738, Mexico.
Alejandro Hinojosa-VelascoDivisión de Neonatología, Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Instituto Materno Infantil del Estado de México, Toluca de Lerdo 50170, Mexico.
María Esther Landero-Montes-de-OcaDepartamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital Gustavo Baz Prada, ISEM, Nezahualcóyotl 57300, Mexico.
Eduardo Davila-GonzalezLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública del Estado de México, ISEM, Toluca de Lerdo 50180, Mexico.
Eduardo González-Del-OlmoLaboratorio de Medicina Traslacional, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.
Fernando Bastida-GonzalezLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública del Estado de México, ISEM, Toluca de Lerdo 50180, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1670-5879
Paola Berenice Zárate-SeguraLaboratorio de Medicina Traslacional, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.
Jaime García-MenaDepartamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Cinvestav, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-3711
Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXInstituto de Salud del Estado de México · MX

Funding

Agencia Mexicana de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AMEXCID) No. AMEXCID 2020-5Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CONACyT-163235 INFR-2011-01Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CONACyT FORDECYT-PRONACES/6669/2020Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores México (SRE) No. SRE/027/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is a severe respiratory disease threatening pregnant women, which increases the possibility of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Several recent studies have demonstrated the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect the mother enterocytes, disturbing the gut microbiota diversity. The aim of this study was to characterize the entero-mammary microbiota of women in the presence of the virus during delivery. Fifty mother−neonate pairs were included in a transversal descriptive work. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in nasopharyngeal, mother rectal swabs (MRS) and neonate rectal swabs (NRS) collected from the pairs, and human colostrum (HC) samples collected from mothers. The microbiota diversity was characterized by high-throughput DNA sequencing of V3-16S rRNA gene libraries prepared from HC, MRS, and NRS. Data were analyzed with QIIME2 and R. Our results indicate that several bacterial taxa are highly abundant in MRS positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. These bacteria mostly belong to the Firmicutes phylum; for instance, the families Bifidobacteriaceae, Oscillospiraceae, and Microbacteriaceae have been previously associated with anti-inflammatory effects, which could explain the capability of women to overcome the infection. All samples, both positive and negative for SARS-CoV-2, featured a high abundance of the Firmicutes phylum. Further data analysis showed that nearly 20% of the bacterial diversity found in HC was also identified in MRS. Spearman correlation analysis highlighted that some genera of the Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla were negatively correlated with MRS and NRS (p < 0.005). This study provides new insights into the gut microbiota of pregnant women and their potential association with a better outcome during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBacillotaBacteriaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Anti-Inflammatory AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Viralfecal microbiotagut microbiotahigh-throughput DNA sequencinghuman colostrummother rectal swabneonate rectal swabRT-ddPCRRT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36142219
PMCPMC9499685
OpenAlexW4295011571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.